Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging: Breakthrough advantages and surmountable challenges

New wafer processing technologies overcome FOWLP’s technical hurdles, paving the way for a new generation of ultra compact, high I/O electronic devices.

BY DAVID BUTLER, SPTS Technologies, an Orbotech company, Hereford, UK

Our ability to create ever-smaller electronic devices that maintain or surpass the performance of their physically larger predecessors – exemplified by today’s wearables, smartphones and tablets – is dictated by many factors that extend well beyond Moore’s Law, from the underlying embedded components to the ways in which they’re packaged together. With regard to the latter, fan-out wafer level packaging (FOWLP) is quickly emerging as the new die and wafer level packaging technique of choice, and is widely antici- pated to underpin the next generation of compact, high performance electronic devices.

Whereas with conventional flip-chip WLP schemes the I/O terminals are spread over the chip surface area, limiting the number of I/O connections, FOWLP embeds individual die in an epoxy mold compound (EMC) with space allocated between each die for additional I/O connection points, avoiding the use of more expensive silicon real estate to accommodate a higher I/O count. Redistribution layers (RDLs) are formed using physical vapor deposition (PVD) and subsequent electroplating and patterning to re-route I/O connections on the die to the mold compound regions on the periphery (FIGURE 1).

FIGURE 1. FOWLP process flow.

FIGURE 1. FOWLP process flow.

Leveraging FOWLP, semiconductor devices with thousands of I/O points can be seamlessly connected via finely-spaced lines as thin as two to five microns, maximizing interconnect density while enabling high bandwidth data transfer. Significant height and cost savings are achieved via the elimination of the substrate.

With FOWLP today we have the ability to embed heterogeneous devices including baseband processors, RF transceivers and power management ICs in these mold wafers, thereby enabling the latest gener- ation of ultra-thin wearables and mobile wireless devices. With continued line and space reductions, FOWLP has the potential to accommodate higher performing devices including memory and application processors, positioning FOWLP to extend into new markets including automotive and medical applications and beyond.

Leading vendors implementing FOWLP today include Amkor, ASE, Freescale, NANIUM, STATS ChipPAC, and TSMC, with TSMC being the most high-profile vendor given its widely-reported contract win to produce A10 processors for Apple’s iPhone 7 – a deal said to be attrib- utable in part to TSMC’s mature FOWLP-based InFO technology.

According to a report entitled “FO WLP Forecast update 09/2015” published by research firm Yole Développement in September 2015, the launch of TSMC’s InFO format is expected to increase industry packaging revenues for FOWLP from $240M in 2015 to $2.4B in 2020. With a projected 54% CAGR, Yole expects FOWLP to be the fastest growing advanced packaging technology in the semiconductor industry.

Low heat, high speed processing

All fan-out wafers feature singulated die embedded in the EMC, with spin-on dielectrics surrounding the RDL. These materials present some unique challenges, including moisture absorption, excessive outgassing and a limited tolerance to elevated temperatures. If not dealt with properly, contamination at the metal deposition stage can compromise contact resistance.

Whereas conventional circuits built on silicon can withstand heat up to 400oC and can be degassed in under one minute, the EMC and dielectrics used in FOWLP have a heat tolerance closer to 120oC. Temperatures exceeding this low threshold can cause decompo- sition and excessive wafer warping. Degassing wafers at such low temperatures naturally takes a longer amount of time, and can drastically reduce the throughput of a conventional sputter system.

Multi-wafer degas (MWD) technology has emerged as a compelling solution to this problem, enabling up to 75 wafers to be degassed at 120oC in parallel before being individually transferred to subsequent pre-clean and sputter deposition, without breaking vacuum.

With this approach, wafers are dynamically pumped under clean, high vacuum conditions, with radiation heat transfer warming wafers directly to temperatures within the operating budget for packaging applications.

Each wafer can spend up to 30 minutes inside the MWD, but because they’re processed in parallel, a “dry” wafer is outputted for metal deposition every 60 to 90 seconds, at a rate of between 30 to 50 wafers per hour. This approach increases PVD system throughput by 2-3 times compared to a single wafer degas processing technology, and as materials emerge with even lower thermal budgets based on increased passivation thickness, longer degas times can be accommodated with no impact on throughput (FIGURE 2).

FIGURE 2. The Sigma fxP PVD system with multi-wafer degas module from Orbotech-SPTS.

FIGURE 2. The Sigma fxP PVD system with multi-wafer degas module from Orbotech-SPTS.

These benefits are not readily attainable, however, unless we can overcome the attendant warping challenges. Epoxy mold wafers can be warped after curing, and the size and shape of the warpage hinge on the different shapes, densities and placement of the embedded die. A FOWLP PVD system must therefore be able to minimize temperature-induced shape shifting, and accommodate wafers with up to a 10mm bow. The acceptable industry threshold for bowing is probably lower than 6mm, however, as it’s not easy to make uniformly thick conductors on a substrate exhibiting 6mm+ warpage.

Utmost integrity

After successful degas, but prior to metal deposition, the FO wafer is pre-cleaned in a plasma etch module. This facilitates the removal of trace oxide layers from the contacts, but due to the composition of the organic dielectric surrounding the contacts, will result in carbon build-upon the chamberwalls.This carbon does not adhere well to ceramic chamber surfaces, and if not carefully managed, can result in early particle failure.

New in-situ paste technologies allow these carbon deposits to better adhere to chamber surfaces during the pre-cleaning process, enabling preventative maintenance intervals that exceed 6,000 wafers. This approach can significantly improve productivity by reducing the frequency of dedicated wafer pastes, which typically require production to be paused every 10 to 20 wafers for chamber pasting when using conventional techniques.

The myriad benefits that FOWLP promises for the production of ultra compact, high I/O electronic devices far outweigh the aforementioned technical barriers to mainstream FOWLP adoption. With the ability to overcome the degassing, warping, and integrity challenges that can impede FOWLP implementations, electronics manufacturers can unlock the full potential of FOWLP while eliminating frictions affecting production speeds and yields.


Easily post a comment below using your Linkedin, Twitter, Google or Facebook account. Comments won't automatically be posted to your social media accounts unless you select to share.

2 thoughts on “Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging: Breakthrough advantages and surmountable challenges

  1. Janet Taafe

    I have dealt a lot with carbon build up on chamber walls in my plasma system. How does an aluminum chamber differ from the ceramic chambers you mentioned in your article? I was under the impression that the majority of carbon exits through the vacuum pump in my system.

  2. SPTS Marketing

    Dear Janet

    I think you might be referring to your system as a diode type configuration, i.e. where a single RF generator is used to generate the plasma and bias.

    The etch module we use is an ICP (Inductively Coupled Plasma) which uses two RF generators, one of the generators couples RF into the ceramic based vacuum chamber via an external coil, the other generator on the substrate electrode for biasing.

    The advantage of a two generator system is that the ion energy and ion flux can be independently controlled. This means that you can effectively have high rate etching ( high flux ) with minimal damage to substrate surface ( low bias ). In a single diode type etch module with single RF supply, flux and energy are increased together.

    When etching polymer based passivation materials, you want to have lots of ions, but minimal energy to avoid breaking through the passivation surface ( liberating contaminates i.e. Co ).

    So an ICP etch chamber limits the amount of passivation damage and release of carbon in the first place. Yes some of the carbon bi-products will be removed via the pumping, but depends on the pumping speed, and opportunity to re-contaminate the bond-pad.

    Therefore low energy etching and high pumping speed as we use on our ICP based SE-LTX etch module are the key components in order to deliver the lowest Rc in UBM.

    We hope you find this info helpful. You can check out our Resources section on our website wihich gives you access to a library of our published papers and presentations:

    SPTS Marketing


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


KLA-Tencor announces new defect inspection systems
07/12/2018KLA-Tencor Corporation announced two new defect inspection products at SEMICON West this week, addressing two key challenges in tool and process monit...
3D-Micromac unveils laser-based high-volume sample preparation solution for semiconductor failure analysis
07/09/2018microPREP 2.0 provides order of magnitude time and cost savings compared to traditional sample...
Leak check semiconductor process chambers quickly and reliably
02/08/2018INFICON,a manufacturer of leak test equipment, introduced the UL3000 Fab leak detector for semiconductor manufacturing maintenance teams t...